The 2 answers that decide whether the policy responds, before the account rather than inside it. A person still decides what they mean.
The unit is leased. Getting the landlord details from the tenant
A liability claim is settled with somebody else, so the handler needs to know who that is before anything can move.
No, nobody was near it
Asked separately because an injury changes who has to be told and how quickly, even where the answer is no.
Their words, not a summary of them. The tool call is shown because it is the answer to the question any handler has about a claim that arrives already populated: the items came off a register that existed before the loss, not out of the conversation.
Driver reversed into a roller shutter door on the way out
Nothing was attached: this loss is not about property on the register.
What is held against what is on the claim. The two numbers, side by side, and no third number worked out from them.
| Line | Figure | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Cover recorded | none recorded | No premium for this appears in the ledger. A ledger shows what is held and never the absence of anything. |
| On this claim | not a property loss | No item list belongs on this kind of claim, so nothing was attached. |
This business keeps no register, so there is nothing to attach and nothing that can be checked against what was held before the loss. Any property lost would have to be established from the policyholder.
No register was available, so every item and proof of purchase would need to be requested from the policyholder. In a live system the next action here is a decision by a person, and the queue would show this case as waiting on one rather than waiting on the policyholder.
No step here accepts a claim, declines one, sets a reserve, values anything for settlement or pays. Those are a person's, and the engine has no route to any of them by design rather than because they have not been built yet.
Every attached line was on the policyholder's register before the loss, most of it put there by a bank statement rather than typed. That is what a handler is being asked to rely on, so the register says per line whether a purchase record exists and this screen repeats it rather than flattening both into "evidenced".
Demo case against a fictional business with synthetic transactions. Nothing here is a real claim and no part of this prototype agrees, values or pays anything.