The public record, at one address
Read from the public register in 2135 milliseconds, with no permission from anybody and nothing handed over. This is what an accountancy practice's registered office looks like from the outside.
Companies use their accountant's address as their registered office, which is why a book like this exists at all. But 15 different buildings share this postcode, and a residents' management company registered care of a property agent is nobody's accountancy client. Every count below is about what files here.
Active, filing at this postcode.
They share this postcode, which is why a book here is not one firm’s client list.
The rest filed a SIC code that says nothing or none at all, which is not a company doing nothing.
Counted here rather than added to the biggest building, which would be a guess.
344 active companies file at EC1R 0NE.
225 of them write Forma House, 40 Bowling Green Lane, across 5 different spellings of it. The other 119 are spread over 14 more buildings at the same postcode, so a book here is companies that file at an address and not one firm's client list.
17 are filed under trades where employing somebody is the ordinary shape of the business, which is where the Employers' Liability duty starts. That is a statement about the trades filed, not about any one company's payroll: the register answers that only from a filed set of accounts, one company at a time.
10 are in trades this engine already treats as higher risk, because they involve work at height, hot work, or a specialist product line rather than the standard one.
102 were incorporated in the last two years, so whatever cover they took out at the start has not been looked at since.
7 match a registered importer or exporter at this postcode by name, which brings goods in transit and product liability into the picture and appears in no accounting ledger as a risk at all.
159 file a SIC code that says nothing about what they do, or none at all. A SIC code is self-selected at incorporation and never audited, so those are not companies doing nothing; they are companies this cannot classify from the register alone.
2 of the rows read are at this postcode and at a building this could not identify, and they are counted here rather than added to the largest one. Putting them somewhere would be a guess that nothing afterwards could see.
None of this needed anybody's permission and none of it says whether any of these businesses is insured. A filed balance sheet has never had a line for insurance in it. What the register gives is who has an exposure; what the ledger gives, once a practice connects one, is what they are doing about it.
Nothing on a crawled book is contacted by Pickle. There is no sender on this deployment and no address for any of these companies in it, because the one address the law now compels a company to file is the one the register does not publish. What a row says is who may contact it and on what footing, and the answer is the practice reading the page or nobody.
Every company here is a body corporate, because Companies House registers nothing else. The people the direct-marketing rules protect are sole traders and ordinary partnerships, who are treated as individuals and need consent nobody has given, and not one of them is on the register or can be. That is the market this product is sold into, and it is reached through an accountant rather than through a postcode.
Nobody is signed in, so 344 of these rows can only carry the general rule. Which of them a practice already acts for is a fact about that practice, and it is answered by signing in as one rather than by anything on the register.
None of this is a list of numbers to ring. A marketing telephone call has to be screened against the Corporate Telephone Preference Service and against whatever the company itself has already said, and neither is answerable from a filed set of accounts. The register publishes no telephone number either, so what is here is a list of companies worth opening.
A crawled row will write you the message and it will not send it, because the sender is you. What comes back is a subject and a body with your practice name in it, the way to stop in it, and nothing in it the register cannot support. It has no address on it, so you address it from your own records and send it from your own mailbox. Nothing on this deployment has ever sent anything to anybody, and a draft is not a step towards that: the message about your own business, which we would sign, is the one thing here that still does not exist.
151 filed at least one, about 252 people between them. That is who to open.
Across the 110 that filed anything above nought, at what their own balance sheets say.
54 of them filed net liabilities rather than net assets.
93 have filed nothing yet, 14 filed a scanned image, 18 would not add up. None is a company with nothing.
All 344 companies were read, over 29 slices of work, and 219 of them produced figures. This is what their own accounts filed.
198 of them filed a number of employees, and 151 filed at least one. Those averages add up to about 252 people across the 198 accounts that state one. That is the difference between a segment and a call list. The breadth view says how many are in trades where employing somebody is ordinary; this says which ones put a number on it.
It is not a list of who owes the Employers' Liability duty, and there is no way to make it one from a stored crawl. The exemption for a single employee who owns half the shares is answered by the register of people with significant control, and nothing about a person is kept here. That register is read live, one company at a time, on the audit of whichever of these is opened.
110 of them carry fixed assets on the last balance sheet they filed, £1,251,996 of it between them. Fixed assets are written-down book value and not what replacing them would cost, so that is a floor on what there is to insure and never a sum insured.
54 of the 211 that filed net assets filed net liabilities, meaning they owed more than they held at the balance-sheet date. That is ordinary for a company funded by its director's loan account and it is also what a distressed balance sheet looks like, and the register does not say which.
125 of the 344 read could not be turned into figures: 14 filed accounts that are a scanned image rather than a tagged document, 93 have filed no accounts yet, 18 filed a document this engine could not add up and would not quote. About two in five filings at Companies House are a scanned image with nothing tagged in them, so that part is the ordinary case rather than a fault. A company that has filed nothing yet is usually a new one: the first accounts are not due for up to twenty-one months, so that is a fact about its age. None of them is a company with nothing: an absence here is an absence of a readable document and says nothing at all about the business.
The newest of these balance sheets is dated 26 June 2026 and the oldest 31 March 2024, which is between 2 and 29 months ago. Every one of them is what was filed for a period that has ended, and not one of them is what is true this morning. A company that laid everybody off in April filed exactly the same accounts.
Nothing about a person was kept. What is stored against EC1R 0NE is a company number and the figures its own accounts filed, with the dates they describe, and nothing else: no name, no address, no director and no score. It is deleted on 17 November 2026, and crawling this postcode again replaces it rather than adding to it.
Ranked by the headcount their own accounts state. A headcount is an average over the year that ended on the date beside it, and the register does not say what is true today: a company that laid everybody off in April filed exactly the same accounts. Opening one runs the full audit, which is where the register of people with significant control is read and where the Employers' Liability duty is stated or the exemption applied. Under each name is what that company is to whoever is reading, which is the section above rather than anything the crawl kept.
| Company | Employees | Fixed assets | Net assets | Year ended | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOMETOUCH CARE LIMITED depends who is asking | 21 | £105,587 | £467,566 | 31 Dec 2024 | 20 Feb 2025 |
| JPK EDUCATION LIMITED depends who is asking | 14 | £7,155 | not tagged | 31 Mar 2025 | 5 Sept 2025 |
| NEMO TRAVEL LTD depends who is asking | 10 | £989 | -£838,838 | 31 Aug 2025 | 21 May 2026 |
| 3A TELECOM CONSULTANCY LTD depends who is asking | 9 | £172,548 | not tagged | 30 Jun 2025 | 30 Jun 2026 |
| CBAMBOO LTD depends who is asking | 9 | £10,764 | £102,121 | 31 Dec 2025 | 26 Mar 2026 |
| MEDIABRAIN LABS LIMITED depends who is asking | 6 | £686 | -£42,420 | 31 May 2026 | 24 Jul 2026 |
| FLEXCLEANING LIMITED depends who is asking | 4 | £0 | £239,071 | 31 Mar 2025 | 23 Sept 2025 |
| EMBER NINE LIMITED depends who is asking | 4 | £1,021 | -£115,728 | 31 Mar 2025 | 31 Dec 2025 |
| RECORDER LIMITED depends who is asking | 4 | £159,048 | £917,707 | 28 Feb 2025 | 14 Nov 2025 |
| THE SCHOOL TRIP GROUP LTD depends who is asking | 3 | £1,771 | £50,139 | 30 Nov 2024 | 22 Aug 2025 |
| INNOVECTIVE LTD depends who is asking | 3 | £6,713 | £36,613 | 31 May 2025 | 26 Nov 2025 |
| APOLLO INTERNATIONAL LTD depends who is asking | 2 | £318 | £127,022 | 30 Sept 2025 | 14 May 2026 |
| THE PHONE NUMBER TESTING COMPANY LTD depends who is asking | 2 | not tagged | -£800 | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Aug 2025 |
| CITYFRINGE BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY CONSULTANTS LTD depends who is asking | 2 | not tagged | £161 | 31 Dec 2024 | 31 Aug 2025 |
| AGILE CONSULTING SERVICES (LONDON) LIMITED depends who is asking | 2 | £1,768 | £121,975 | 31 Aug 2025 | 18 May 2026 |
| BUT WHAT IF... LTD depends who is asking | 2 | not tagged | £100 | 31 Jan 2025 | 31 Oct 2025 |
| FERNBROOK CONSULTING ENGINEERS LIMITED depends who is asking | 2 | £363 | £9,666 | 31 Mar 2026 | 6 Aug 2026 |
| SUMU CONSULTING LIMITED depends who is asking | 2 | not tagged | -£5,910 | 31 Jan 2025 | 19 Jun 2025 |
| ORCHID RANCH LIMITED depends who is asking | 2 | £981 | £97,771 | 30 Apr 2025 | 30 Jan 2026 |
| STEVE WOOD ASSOCIATES LTD depends who is asking | 2 | £1,204 | £732 | 31 Jul 2025 | 30 Apr 2026 |
| THE COUNSELLING AND PSYCHOTHERAPY ROOM LTD depends who is asking | 2 | £119 | £10,715 | 30 Nov 2024 | 28 Aug 2025 |
| LOUD MOBILITY LIMITED depends who is asking | 2 | £2,696 | £1 | 30 Nov 2024 | 31 Aug 2025 |
| POPCORN TV LTD depends who is asking | 2 | not tagged | -£8,559 | 31 Dec 2024 | 6 Oct 2025 |
| PROTIP UK LIMITED depends who is asking | 2 | £338 | £181 | 31 May 2025 | 9 Feb 2026 |
| 2S CONSTRUCTIONS LTD depends who is asking | 2 | £1,192 | -£12,771 | 30 Sept 2025 | 19 Jan 2026 |
Marking a call needs somewhere for the mark to belong, and nobody is signed in. A practice signed in here marks a call against its own account, and it is there when it comes back, after this crawl has been replaced and after the figures on it have been deleted.
A message needs somebody to sign it, and nobody is signed in. A draft here carries the name of the practice writing it, because a marketing email has to say who sent it and has to offer a working way to stop, and both of those are the practice and never us.
The same building is written several ways, because every one of these was typed by a different person. Two spellings are grouped only where some company wrote both halves of the address, which is evidence rather than resemblance. Nothing is merged because it looks similar: merging two buildings that are not one would be silent, and leaving them apart is not.
| As written | Companies | Spellings |
|---|---|---|
| Forma House, 40 Bowling Green Lane | 225 | 5 |
| 40 Bowling Green Lane | 45 | 12 |
| C/O Apollo International Ltd Studio 133, 40 Bowling Green Lane | 21 | 1 |
| Finsbury Business Centre, 40 Bowling Green Lane | 14 | 6 |
| 40 C/O Era Property Services Ltd, Bowling Green Lane | 7 | 7 |
| Forma House 40 Bowling Green Lane, Farringdon | 6 | 2 |
| 40, Bowling Green Lane Steeple Court Management Co Ltd, C/O Era Property Services Ltd | 5 | 5 |
| Unit 302 The Finsbury Business Centre, 40 Bowling Green Lane | 4 | 2 |
| Fbc Clerkenwell, 40 Bowling Green Ln | 3 | 3 |
| The Datacentre, 40 Bowling Green Lane | 3 | 1 |
| Unit 302, The Finsbury Business Centre, 40 Bowling Green Lane | 3 | 2 |
| Ballpoint Fbc Clerkenwell, 40 Bowling Green Ln | 2 | 1 |
| Unit 123 40 Bowling Green Lane | 2 | 1 |
| 40, Forma House Bowling Green Lane | 1 | 1 |
| Unit 302 40 Bowling Green Lane | 1 | 1 |
At this postcode, at a building this could not identify40 Eleanor Greenaway, Julia House Freehold Co Ltd / Studio 133 40 Bowling Green Lane |
2 | – |
From the SIC codes the register returns with the search, so this needed no extra request. A SIC code is chosen once on the incorporation form and never audited, which is why 159 of them say nothing at all and are not in this table.
| Filed as | Companies | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Software developer | 75 | Nothing the taxonomy flags |
| Consultant | 63 | Nothing the taxonomy flags |
| Designer | 15 | Nothing the taxonomy flags |
| Architect | 7 | Nothing the taxonomy flags |
| Builder | 7 | Work at height, hot work or a specialist line |
| Artist / maker | 3 | Nothing the taxonomy flags |
| Cleaner | 3 | A trade where employing somebody is ordinary |
| Plumber / heating engineer | 3 | Work at height, hot work or a specialist line |
| Accountant / bookkeeper | 2 | Nothing the taxonomy flags |
| Hairdresser / barber | 2 | A trade where employing somebody is ordinary |
| Project manager | 2 | Nothing the taxonomy flags |
| Personal trainer | 1 | A trade where employing somebody is ordinary |
The register can say who has an exposure. It cannot say who lacks cover: a filed balance sheet has never had a line for insurance in it, so an absence here is an absence of a field and not evidence about anybody.
It also cannot tell you who owes the Employers' Liability duty. The exemption for a single employee who owns half the shares is answered by the register of people with significant control, and a crawl keeps nothing about a person, so that register is read live on the audit of whichever company is opened and is never written down.
And it cannot tell you whether any of these has already said it does not want to hear from anybody. There is no address here to write to, no telephone number, and nothing that reads the Corporate Telephone Preference Service or a company's own objection, all of which sit outside the register. A mark against a row is the day you said you had called and nothing else: there is no note beside it, on purpose, because a note is where what somebody said on the telephone would end up.
And it cannot send the message it writes you, which is not a missing button. The sender of a message to a company that is not your customer is you, so what this produces is a draft with your name on it and no address on it, and it is not kept anywhere afterwards: reloading the page composes it again from the same figures. The other message, the one about a business on an account that we would sign and send, is still the one thing here that does not exist.